Dinosaur Renaissance

A blog about a whole lot of nothing. And occasionally dinosaurs.

I’m under attack all the time. They call me gay, there are death threats. There are times where I’m not thinking as clearly as I should, and in those unclear moments, I always think to myself, ‘Fire the first shot.’ Bring it on. Because I know who’s on our side. They can only win a rhetorical and propaganda war. They cannot win. We outnumber them in this country, and we have the guns. I’m not kidding. They talk a mean game, but they will not cross that line because they know what they’re dealing with.

And I have people who come up to me in the military, major named people in the military, who grab me and they go, ‘Thank you for what you’re doing, we’ve got your back.’ They understand that. These are the unspoken things we know, they know.

Andrew Breitbart, fantasizing about starting a civil war and killing liberals at a Boston Tea Party event. 

I’d like to compare and contrast for a second. Conservatives got all riled up over Teamster President Jimmy Hoffa’s comments on Labor Day. At a rally in Detroit, he said, “President Obama, this is your army. We are ready to march. And President Obama we want one thing: Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. Jobs. That’s what we’re going to tell him. He’s going to be - and when he sees what we’re doing here he will be inspired. But he needs help and you know what? Everybody here’s got to vote. If we go back and keep the eye on the prize, let’s take these sons of bitches out and give America back to America where we belong!”

So he’s talking about voting anti-union politicians out of office. Conservatives self-righteously condemned his remarks as “thuggery” and “hate speech.” Tea Party Express leader Amy Kremer said, “It is high time that elected leaders like President Obama were held accountable when their key supporters engage in harmful and divisive rhetoric.” Well, I think Breitbart’s quite clear, particularly when he says, “We outnumber them in this country and we have the guns…”

Penn Bullock at Towleroad writes, “On the face of it, Breitbart’s admission demands a congressional or criminal investigation. If he’s implying that military officials have pledged their armed support to him and the right-wing, those officials are guilty of treason. If Breitbart is lying, he’s diagnosable.” I’d agree. If (and that’s a big IF) he’s telling the truth, those “military officials” are supporting armed insurrection against the American government and its people. The military tends to frown on its members doing that. 

Watch the video of Breitbart’s remarks here. So, how long before Breitbart gets on Fox News and whines about it being taken out of context? Hoffa’s comment was taken out of context. This isn’t. This is talking about bullets v. ballot boxes and the bullets winning.

(via cognitivedissonance)

That’s an intelligent way to respond to random death threats, threaten to kill liberals in a bloody war. This is a very clear and very direct threat unlike any I’ve ever seen. Conservatives love to make gun and violence based political statements but yeah for the most part it’s just to rally the base, this however is something else, this is “I can’t wait till I can shoot a liberal that called me names with the military behind me.”

Scary shit.


(via stfuconservatives)

I’m reblogging this because if this doesn’t frighten you then you aren’t paying attention. 

(via pieceinthepuzzlehumanity)

It scares me to know that there are people who glorify the death of others based on their political ideology and it scares me that he is not the only one.

(via wateroftheclearestblue)

(via womanistgamergirl)

A little history: I was born and raised here. I love this state. It seems right here. Trees are the right height. I like seeing the lakes. I love the lakes. There’s something very special here. The Great Lakes, but also all the little inland lakes that dot the parts of Michigan. Um, I love cars.

Republican presidential candidate MITT ROMNEY, in remarks passionately delivered on Feb. 16, 2012. (via thingsmittromneysays)

(via inothernews)

[TW: Rape] Quick Question for Women


How can mandating ultrasound/trans-vaginal screenings before an abortion can be done be any more intrusive than abortion itself? 


Because the people who would be affected by this mandate are willingly seeking a abortion, which is a medical procedure. 

But the transvaginal ultrasound is a completely, totally, 100% unnecessary procedure that has no bearing, whatsoever, on the abortion.  So the state governments trying to pass these laws want to force doctors to perform medically unnecessary procedures on people who are not allowed to say no.  The states would force doctors to do the ultrasound without the consent of the patient.  That is state-sanctioned rape.  You can look up the Department of Justice’s definition of rape if you don’t believe me.

The ONLY way a patient could turn down the transvaginal ultrasound would be to opt out of the abortion altogether.  This law would make it impossible for patients to seek a constitutionally-protected medical procedure without having to be forced to go through what basically boils down to a sexual assault. 

(Source: lockeinc)